DISINVESTMENT IN A WELFARE STATE

Two concepts are there first is that of Adam Smith's, who talked about laissez-faire and emphasises upon market economy with almost no intervention of state and second is that of John Maynard Keynes also called  Keynesian theory who talked about strong intervention of state in market economy. Now the importance of raising this issue today is hidden in the event which the whole world witnessed from 1929 to 1933 that is the period of the great depression. Till then every thing was quite good, market economy was doing quite well and the concept of laissez-faire was proving to be a quite handy concept since it was increasing the competition among the service providers and thus was quite good for consumers also. But the great depression of 1929-1933  made it wrong. And then came the Keynesian theory with emphasis on intervention of state in market economy and helped the world economy to overcome the great depression.


The same situation seems to be appearing now also. And our government is disinvesting all the public sector undertakings (PSU) even that also which are in profit. While we are a welfare state and the fact that private companies looks for profit only, they don't care about the welfare of the people or about the social security. Hence it is the first duty of government to ensure social security and welfare of the people along with facilitating the private sector.

There is no doubt that liberalisation, privatization and globalisation has helped us a lot to strengthen our economy but it is also true that we are a developing country and a large section of society is still below the poverty line. As we can see the people on road now a days walking thousand of km to reach their native land. Hence it is true that poverty is there in our country and everything is not good. Hence the importance of state intervention increases many fold in our country as compared to others. And for this the importance of PSU'S  is much more for us since it strengthen the hand of state economically. But unfortunately now a days it has become the means of making money, the asset which this country has developed is being sell out at the throw away prices, some of them are profit making undertakings also. It becomes more doubtful and irreconcilable when you are selling a profit making undertaking at throw away price and on the other hand investing in a almost insolvent private banking company like YES Bank. It is good that you are heading towards New Public Management but not at the cost of the people of this country. Since we are a welfare state there must be an alternative source of income, levying different taxes on public and corporates could not be the only source of income rather there must be some other sustainable source of income too and public undertaking could be one of them.

As a welfare state and with an objective of achieving the socialistic pattern of society through democratic means, disinvestment is not at all in the interest of the republic ethos of this country. One can not give all the resources of production in the hand of few capitalists. It is not the matter of which theory you are adopting, either the theory of laissez faire or Keynesian theory rather it is about the reaching to the people who are the most marginalized and derived, the people who are on the road. But the present situation of this country gives the feeling that the whole resource of this country is being given to the rich and the deprived and destitute are confined only to assurances and speeches.

If it is the new nationalism which this government is talking about then they must consult some real experts since it has been  neither the objective of the constitution nor the way of heading towards the inclusive development of this country. It seems like neither we are heading towards the way of Adam Smith nor Keynesian theory rather toward promoting crony capitalism or towards parking all the resources of this country in the hand of few capitalists. Self reliance is very good concept but it is not possible unless the poor and deprived are not made self reliant first. And it is only possible when government will take some resources from the rich and will distribute them in deprived. It would be also the way of heading towards making a socialistic pattern of society through democratic means. Hence the whole and sole objective of government should be to strengthen the situation of poor and deprived and private sector facilitation should be the secondary objective.


Previous
Next Post »

Kids Can Learn the Coding in an Easy Game like Format through IIT Madras Startup’s App

Due to The demand of coding in future, most of parents wants their kids learn to code. It is type different skillset that every child must k...